Skip to main content
Solutions / Federal

Adopt AI agents at agency scale, under agency rules.

The governance layer that lets a federal agency say yes to AI agents, with the controls and the paper trail to back it.

FedRAMPthe government's standardized cloud-security authorization programFISMAthe federal law setting information-security requirements for agenciesNIST 800-53the federal security and privacy control catalogNIST AI RMFthe federal framework for managing AI risk

How Agentomy helps government agencies

01

Who authorized this?

Every agent action ties back to an operator and an authorization level, not to whoever wrote the code.

02

Mapped to your controls

Governance capabilities mapped to NIST 800-53 and the AI RMF, so readiness is legible to your ATO process.

03

Sovereign by design

Self-hosted or in a dedicated tenant. Tenant-isolated data and keys; self-hosted keeps both in your environment.

In practice

Plausible scenarios

Concrete ways an agent goes wrong here without governance, and the control that catches each one.

01

An agent reaches past its case

An agent with access to a case-management system tries to read records outside the matter it was assigned. Tier-gated authorization, tied to an operator rather than to whoever wrote the code, blocks the access and logs the denial.

02

A shadow agent outside the ATO

A program office stands up an agent without the security team's knowledge, outside the boundary of its authority-to-operate (ATO, the formal approval to run a system). Continuous discovery surfaces it and holds it to read-only until it is authorized.

03

Who authorized this action?

An agent takes a consequential action and an inspector general asks who stood behind it. Every action ties back to a named operator and an authorization level, so the answer is a record, not a guess.

04

An agent drifts from its baseline

An agent's access pattern shifts well outside its historical norm. Behavioral monitoring flags the drift and auto-quarantines it before a small anomaly becomes an incident.

05

Readiness the ATO process can read

An assessor needs to see how agent governance maps to NIST 800-53 (the federal security and privacy control catalog). Agentomy exports readiness evidence mapped to those controls, so the review is legible to the ATO process.

Frameworks

Mapped to the frameworks you answer to.

Expand any framework to see what it means and what Agentomy provides.

See it in the record

Every action, logged and provable.

A tamper-evident, hash-linked trail of every governance decision, exportable to the framework your auditors care about. No error codes; plain-English reasons for every allow and deny.

Agentomy Command CenterFilter Government Agencies
  • 100% Integrity
  • 40,157 Blocks
  • SHA-256 hash-linked
Audit trail: one tamper-evident block per governance decision, hash-linked to the one before it
BlockTimestampAgentActionTierHash
40,157Today 12:42:08casework-research-agentdata_access_requestEvaluator015e5b7c2f2229d7
40,156Today 12:41:54resident-triage-agentoutput_validationAnalystb0cf123affd62d9b
40,155Today 12:41:37contract-review-agentpolicy_checkBuilderb6d00f7e795a151f
40,154Today 12:40:58benefits-extract-agentbehavior_driftOperatorfed94136e32a69b0
40,153Today 12:40:21records-draft-agenthalt_initiatedStrategistc832e55ac2640a63
40,152Today 12:39:46transparency-report-agentprompt_reviewEvaluatorebb726dc2654c13a
Governance events today: 12,842Demo environment
Illustrative interface with sample data, in the shipped Command Center’s structure. Not a customer environment and not a live feed.

Ready to govern your agents?