Skip to main content
Use case · Enterprise

Aerospace & Defense Manufacturing Governance

Govern AI agents on safety-critical engineering, industrial and operational-technology systems, and export-controlled defense supply chains, so no agent acts on those systems or that technical data without authorization and a provable record.

The risk

What an ungoverned agent gets wrong here.

A company like a large aerospace and defense manufacturer runs AI agents against some of the highest-stakes systems in industry: safety-critical engineering and design, industrial and operational-technology (OT, the systems that run physical production) environments, and export-controlled defense supply chains. A mistake here is not a bad dashboard. It is a change to a physical process or an export-controlled drawing. Without governance, an agent can act on an OT or engineering system, or reach export-controlled technical data, with no authorized operator behind it and no record that will satisfy a defense auditor. This work overlaps directly with the requirements a defense contractor already answers to.

Without governance

Where it goes wrong.

01

An agent reaches an OT system

An agent pushes a change to an operational-technology system on the production floor, a physical process, not a document. Tier-gated authorization holds the change for a named operator and enforces hard limits before anything executes.

02

Export-controlled data to the wrong account

An engineering agent attempts to share ITAR (export-controlled defense) technical data with an account not eligible to receive it. Authorization ties the action to the operator's eligibility, refuses it, and records the attempt.

03

A safety-critical design changed silently

An agent edits a safety-critical engineering record in a way that would ship without review. Behavioral monitoring flags the out-of-pattern change and auto-quarantines the agent before it propagates.

04

The defense auditor wants proof

An auditor asks who, or what, touched a controlled record and under whose authority. A tamper-evident, hash-linked trail answers it, mapped to the controls a defense contract requires.

With Agentomy

How Agentomy governs it.

01

Enforce authority on OT and engineering actions

Any action on operational-technology or safety-critical engineering systems is tier-gated to a named operator's authorization, with hard limits enforced rather than advised.

02

Guard export-controlled data

Access to export-controlled technical data is scoped and tied to operator eligibility, so an agent cannot move ITAR-controlled material outside its authorized boundary.

03

Discover, monitor, and halt

Inventory every agent touching these systems, hold unregistered ones to read-only, flag drift with auto-quarantine, and halt the fleet in a fraction of a second when needed.

04

Prove it to a defense auditor

A tamper-evident, hash-linked record captures every action (what changed, under whose authorization, and why), exportable and mapped to the controls a defense contract requires. See also Defense Contractors under Solutions.

Frameworks

Maps to what you answer to.

Agentomy does not certify you. It gives you the enforcement and the audit trail these frameworks ask for, so readiness is something you can show rather than assert.

ISO 27001the international information-security management standard; governance maps to its access-control and monitoring requirementsCMMCthe Cybersecurity Maturity Model Certification the US Department of Defense requires of its contractors; Agentomy provides enforcement and evidence you can map toward its requirementsITARthe International Traffic in Arms Regulations, the US export rules for defense-related technical data; access controls and the audit trail give you the boundary and the record these require
See it in the record

Every action, logged and provable.

A tamper-evident, hash-linked trail of every governance decision for this workload: what an agent did, under whose authorization, and why. Plain-English reasons for every allow and deny, exportable to the framework your auditors care about.

Agentomy Command CenterFilter Aerospace & Defense Manufacturing Governance
  • 100% Integrity
  • 47,089 Blocks
  • SHA-256 hash-linked
Audit trail: one tamper-evident block per governance decision, hash-linked to the one before it
BlockTimestampAgentActionTierHash
47,089Today 12:42:08threat-research-agentdata_access_requestEvaluatorb04f34e464fdf0de
47,088Today 12:41:54request-triage-agentoutput_validationAnalyst6413044598e2062b
47,087Today 12:41:37supplier-clearance-agentpolicy_checkBuilder21e5e65f511cc694
47,086Today 12:40:58export-control-agentbehavior_driftOperatorbb1d1485ca0d40c9
47,085Today 12:40:21classification-draft-agenthalt_initiatedStrategiste4f752e279fdce76
47,084Today 12:39:46readiness-report-agentprompt_reviewEvaluatoraded3df443e10d4d
Governance events today: 12,842Demo environment
Illustrative interface with sample data, in the shipped Command Center’s structure. Not a customer environment and not a live feed.

Ready to govern your agents?