How Agentomy compares.
Governance is a crowded word. Several categories use it to mean different things, and a buyer evaluating us is usually evaluating one of them at the same time. These pages set out what each adjacent product does well, and the axis on which it differs from what we do.
Agentomy and Microsoft Agent 365
Agent 365 registers agents in the Microsoft 365 admin plane and manages them alongside human accounts. Agentomy decides each action and keeps the record, on any stack. One governs the estate, the other governs the act.
Agent identity substrateAgentomy and Buzz
Buzz gives agents cryptographic identity and membership. Agentomy decides whether a given action by that identity is permitted, and keeps the record. Identity is who; governance is what they may do.
Defensive security AIAgentomy and Corma
Corma is building a foundation model for cyber defence, deployed as agents across existing security tooling. Detection asks what happened; governance decides what is allowed. An enterprise running their agents has more to govern, not less.
SaaS management and identity governanceAgentomy and Zluri
Identity governance decides who holds standing access and reviews it on a cycle. Agent governance decides each use of that access, as it happens. A quarterly certification cannot govern something acting continuously.
The one comparison we cannot write for you
Whatever you are running today, the useful comparison is the one you produce yourself against your own system. The benchmark is open, the scenarios are published, and it scores any governance API rather than only ours. A number you generate is worth more than a table we wrote.
Run GovernanceBench against your own platform · See what the governance layer does